Meropenem vs standard of care for treatment of neonatal late onset sepsis (NeoMero1): A randomised controlled trial.
Title | Meropenem vs standard of care for treatment of neonatal late onset sepsis (NeoMero1): A randomised controlled trial. |
Publication Type | Journal Article |
Year of Publication | 2020 |
Authors | Lutsar, I., Chazallon C., Trafojer U., de Cabre V. Meiffredy, Auriti C., Bertaina C., Carducci F. Ippolita C., Canpolat F. Emre, Esposito S., Fournier I., Hallik M., Heath P. T., Ilmoja M-L., Iosifidis E., Kuznetsova J., Meyer L., Metsvaht T., Mitsiakos G., Pana Z. Dorothea, Mosca F., Pugni L., Roilides E., Rossi P., Sarafidis K., Sanchez L., Sharland M., Usonis V., Warris A., Aboulker J-P., & Giaquinto C. |
Corporate Authors | NeoMero Consortium |
Journal | PLoS One |
Volume | 15 |
Issue | 3 |
Pagination | e0229380 |
Date Published | 2020 |
ISSN | 1932-6203 |
Keywords | Female, Humans, Infant, Male, Meropenem, Neonatal Sepsis, Safety, Standard of Care, Treatment Outcome |
Abstract | BACKGROUND: The early use of broad-spectrum antibiotics remains the cornerstone for the treatment of neonatal late onset sepsis (LOS). However, which antibiotics should be used is still debatable, as relevant studies were conducted more than 20 years ago, recruited in single centres or countries, evaluated antibiotics not in clinical use anymore and had variable inclusion/exclusion criteria and outcome measures. Moreover, antibiotic-resistant bacteria have become a major problem in many countries worldwide. We hypothesized that efficacy of meropenem as a broad-spectrum antibiotic is superior to standard of care regimens (SOC) in empiric treatment of LOS and aimed to compare meropenem to SOC in infants aged <90 days with LOS. |
DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0229380 |
Alternate Journal | PLoS One |
PubMed ID | 32130261 |
PubMed Central ID | PMC7055900 |