The english version of the website is under development. Wherever text appears in Greek, it means it has not been translated yet.

Δημοσίευση

Endoscopic hemostasis using monopolar coagulation for postendoscopic sphincterotomy bleeding refractory to injection treatment.

TitleEndoscopic hemostasis using monopolar coagulation for postendoscopic sphincterotomy bleeding refractory to injection treatment.
Publication TypeJournal Article
Year of Publication2010
AuthorsKatsinelos, P., Kountouras J., Chatzimavroudis G., Zavos C., Fasoulas K., Katsinelos T., Pilpilidis I., & Paroutoglou G.
JournalSurg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech
Volume20
Issue2
Pagination84-8
Date Published2010 Apr
ISSN1534-4908
KeywordsAdult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Female, Hemostasis, Endoscopic, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Postoperative Complications, Postoperative Hemorrhage, Sphincterotomy, Endoscopic
Abstract

BACKGROUND: Endoscopic sphincterotomy (ES) is the cornerstone of therapeutic ERCP and bleeding is one of its most frequent and serious complications. Monopolar coagulation has been used effectively for many causes of gastrointestinal hemorrhages. We investigated the efficacy and safety of endoscopically delivered monopolar coagulation through a polypectomy snare in patients with ES-induced bleeding not responding to injection treatment.PATIENTS AND METHODS: The study included 672 consecutive patients who underwent ES between June 2007 and January 2009. Bleeding patterns (trickle, oozing, spurting) were recorded. Patients with bleeding not responding to spray irrigation or injection of 0.9% NaCl+epinephrine 1: 10,000 solution were treated with monopolar coagulation. Complications related to the technique were assessed.RESULTS: ES-induced bleeding occurred in 59 patients (8.78%). Visible bleeding patterns immediately after ES were: 32 trickle, 21 oozing, and 4 spurting. Delayed bleeding was observed in 2 patients. In 11 patients with intraprocedural bleeding (7 oozing and 4 spurting) not responding to spray irrigation and injection treatment with epinephrine solution, bleeding was successfully treated with monopolar coagulation. There were no procedure-related complications in this series.CONCLUSIONS: Monopolar coagulation is an effective and safe treatment modality and is recommended as an alternative method to other therapeutic modalities for post-ES bleeding not responding to injection treatment.

DOI10.1097/SLE.0b013e3181d76ace
Alternate JournalSurg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech
PubMed ID20393333

Contact

Secretariat of the School of Medicine
 

Connect

School of Medicine's presence in social networks
Follow Us or Connect with us.