The english version of the website is under development. Wherever text appears in Greek, it means it has not been translated yet.

Δημοσίευση

Prevalence and clinical outcomes of incidentally diagnosed hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.

TitlePrevalence and clinical outcomes of incidentally diagnosed hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.
Publication TypeJournal Article
Year of Publication2010
AuthorsEfthimiadis, G. K., Parcharidou D., Pagourelias E. D., Meditskou S., Spanos G., Hadjimiltiades S., Pliakos C., Gavrielides S., Karvounis H., Styliadis I. H., & Parcharidis G. E.
JournalAm J Cardiol
Volume105
Issue10
Pagination1445-50
Date Published2010 May 15
ISSN1879-1913
KeywordsAdult, Age Distribution, Cardiomyopathy, Hypertrophic, Cause of Death, Chi-Square Distribution, Cohort Studies, Death, Sudden, Echocardiography, Doppler, Color, Echocardiography, Doppler, Pulsed, Electrocardiography, Exercise Test, Female, Humans, Incidental Findings, Kaplan-Meier Estimate, Male, Middle Aged, Physical Examination, Prevalence, Prognosis, Proportional Hazards Models, Retrospective Studies, Severity of Illness Index, Sex Distribution, Statistics, Nonparametric, Survival Analysis
Abstract

The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the prevalence and prognosis of patients incidentally diagnosed with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HC). We studied 380 consecutive patients with HC (49.3 +/- 17.2 years; 65% men) for a median of 58 months (range 6 to 454). The patients were divided into 2 groups: those incidentally diagnosed from routine examination findings (precordial murmur and/or abnormal electrocardiographic findings) and those diagnosed either because of symptomatic status or by screening because of a family history of HC. Those patients who had been incidentally diagnosed constituted 29.2% of our study cohort. Although overall mortality did not differ between the 2 groups (p = 0.12), the patients diagnosed either because of symptoms or a family history tended to have at least a 4.5-fold greater risk of cardiovascular death (relative risk 4.5, 95% confidence interval 1.04 to 19.6, p = 0.04) and a 4.22 greater risk of sudden death (relative risk 4.22, 95% confidence interval 1.0 to 18.22, p = 0.04). Despite the greater sudden death mortality among the nonincidentally diagnosed patients, no statistically significant difference was found concerning the sudden death risk factor frequency (p = 0.96) between the 2 groups. In conclusion, the discrepancy between the low numbers of patients reported by published registries and the relatively high prevalence of the disease in the general population can be attributed to the large number of patients who remain asymptomatic, even throughout their life, awaiting an accidental diagnosis. Those patients with an incidental diagnosis have a more benign course, as shown by the total cardiovascular and composite sudden death mortality. A high level of awareness and suspicion for HC among physicians is essential for clinical recognition of such patients.

DOI10.1016/j.amjcard.2009.12.066
Alternate JournalAm. J. Cardiol.
PubMed ID20451692

Contact

Secretariat of the School of Medicine
 

Connect

School of Medicine's presence in social networks
Follow Us or Connect with us.