The english version of the website is under development. Wherever text appears in Greek, it means it has not been translated yet.

Δημοσίευση

Evaluation of pullout strength and failure mechanism of posterior instrumentation in normal and osteopenic thoracic vertebrae.

TitleEvaluation of pullout strength and failure mechanism of posterior instrumentation in normal and osteopenic thoracic vertebrae.
Publication TypeJournal Article
Year of Publication2010
AuthorsPaxinos, O., Tsitsopoulos P. P., Zindrick M. R., Voronov L. I., Lorenz M. A., Havey R. M., & Patwardhan A. G.
JournalJ Neurosurg Spine
Volume13
Issue4
Pagination469-76
Date Published2010 Oct
ISSN1547-5646
KeywordsBiomechanical Phenomena, Bone Density, Bone Diseases, Metabolic, Bone Nails, Bone Plates, Bone Screws, Bone Wires, Equipment Design, Equipment Failure, Humans, In Vitro Techniques, Materials Testing, Orthopedic Fixation Devices, Orthopedic Procedures, Spinal Fractures, Thoracic Vertebrae, Titanium
Abstract

OBJECT: There is limited data on the pullout strength of spinal fixation devices in the thoracic spine among individuals with different bone quality. An in vitro biomechanical study on the thoracic spine was performed to compare the pullout strength and the mechanism of failure of 4 posterior fixation thoracic constructs in relation to bone mineral density (BMD).METHODS: A total of 80 vertebrae from 11 fresh-frozen thoracic spines (T2-12) were used. Based on the results from peripheral quantitative CT, specimens were divided into 2 groups (normal and osteopenic) according to their BMD. They were then randomly assigned to 1 of 4 different instrumentation systems (sublaminar wires, pedicle screws, lamina claw hooks, or pedicle screws with wires). The construct was completed with 2 titanium rods and 2 transverse connectors, creating a stable frame. The pullout force to failure perpendicular to the rods as well as the pattern of fixation failure was recorded.RESULTS: Mean pullout force in the osteopenic Group A (36 vertebrae) was 473.2 ± 179.2 N and in the normal BMD Group B (44 vertebrae) was 1414.5 ± 554.8 N. In Group A, no significant difference in pullout strength was encountered among the different implants (p = 0.96). In Group B, the hook system failed because of dislocation with significantly less force than the other 3 constructs (931.9 ± 345.1 N vs an average of 1538.6 ± 532.7 N; p = 0.02). In the osteopenic group, larger screws demonstrated greater resistance to pullout (p = 0.011). The most common failure mechanism in both groups was through pedicle base fracture.CONCLUSIONS: Bone quality is an important factor that influences stability of posterior thoracic implants. Fixation strength in the osteopenic group was one-fourth of the value measured in vertebrae with good bone quality, irrespective of the instrumentation used. However, in normal bone quality vertebrae, the lamina hook claw system dislocated with significantly less force when compared with other spinal implants. Further studies are needed to investigate the impact of different transpedicular screw designs on the pullout strength in normal and osteopenic thoracic spines.

DOI10.3171/2010.4.SPINE09764
Alternate JournalJ Neurosurg Spine
PubMed ID20887144

Contact

Secretariat of the School of Medicine
 

Connect

School of Medicine's presence in social networks
Follow Us or Connect with us.