The english version of the website is under development. Wherever text appears in Greek, it means it has not been translated yet.

Δημοσίευση

Exploring why European primary care physicians sometimes do not think of, or act on, a possible cancer diagnosis. A qualitative study.

TitleExploring why European primary care physicians sometimes do not think of, or act on, a possible cancer diagnosis. A qualitative study.
Publication TypeJournal Article
Year of Publication2023
AuthorsHajdarevic, S., Högberg C., Marzo-Castillejo M., Siliņa V., Sawicka-Powierza J., Esteva M., Koskela T., Petek D., Contreras-Martos S., Mangione M., Adžić Z. Ožvačić, Asenova R., Babić S. Gašparovi, Brekke M., Buczkowski K., Buono N., Cifcili S. Serap, Dinant G-J., Doorn B., Hoffman R. D., Kuodza G., Murchie P., Pilv L., Puia A., Rapalavicius A., Smyrnakis E., Weltermann B., & Harris M.
JournalBJGP Open
Volume7
Issue4
Date Published2023 Dec
ISSN2398-3795
Abstract

BACKGROUND: While primary care physicians (PCPs) play a key role in cancer detection, they can find cancer diagnosis challenging, and some patients have considerable delays between presentation and onward referral.
AIM: To explore European PCPs' experiences and views on cases where they considered that they had been slow to think of, or act on, a possible cancer diagnosis.
DESIGN & SETTING: A multicentre European qualitative study, based on an online survey with open-ended questions, asking PCPs for their narratives about cases when they had missed a diagnosis of cancer.
METHOD: Using maximum variation sampling, PCPs in 23 European countries were asked to describe what happened in a case where they were slow to think of a cancer diagnosis, and for their views on why it happened. Thematic analysis was used to analyse the data.
RESULTS: A total of 158 PCPs completed the questionnaire. The main themes were as follows: patients' descriptions did not suggest cancer; distracting factors reduced PCPs' cancer suspicions; patients' hesitancy delayed the diagnosis; system factors not facilitating timely diagnosis; PCPs felt that they had acted wrongly; and problems with communicating adequately.
CONCLUSION: The study identified six overarching themes that need to be addressed. Doing so should reduce morbidity and mortality in the small proportion of patients who have a significant, avoidable delay in their cancer diagnosis. The 'Swiss cheese' model of accident causation showed how the themes related to each other.

DOI10.3399/BJGPO.2023.0029
Alternate JournalBJGP Open
PubMed ID37380218

Contact

Secretariat of the School of Medicine
 

Connect

School of Medicine's presence in social networks
Follow Us or Connect with us.