The english version of the website is under development. Wherever text appears in Greek, it means it has not been translated yet.

Δημοσίευση

Human papillomavirus and cervical screening: misconceptions undermine adherence.

TitleHuman papillomavirus and cervical screening: misconceptions undermine adherence.
Publication TypeJournal Article
Year of Publication2011
AuthorsPanagopoulou, E., Giata O., Montgomery A., Dinas K., & Benos A.
JournalAm J Health Promot
Volume26
Issue1
Pagination6-9
Date Published2011 Sep-Oct
ISSN0890-1171
KeywordsData Collection, Early Detection of Cancer, Female, Greece, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Humans, Logistic Models, Papanicolaou Test, Papillomavirus Infections, Patient Compliance, Self Report, Students, Medical, Universities, Uterine Cervical Neoplasms, Vaginal Smears, Young Adult
Abstract

PURPOSE: Prophylactic vaccination programs in conjunction with cervical screening can significantly reduce the incidence of cervical cancer worldwide. This study tested the hypothesis that human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination can adversely affect adherence to cervical screening if the public develops the misconception that the HPV vaccination has removed the need for screening.DESIGN: A postal survey using a stratified random sample was employed.PARTICIPANTS: Overall, 500 medical students and 500 nonmedical students of the Aristotle University of Thessaloniki were invited to participate. The response rate was 82%.MEASURES: A questionnaire was developed assessing demographic characteristics, adherence to cervical screening, and awareness and attitudes toward HPV.ANALYSIS: Logistic regression was used to assess the impact of HPV awareness and attitudes towards HPV vaccination on adherence to Papanicolaou screening, controlling for place of origin and mother's screening behavior.RESULTS: Students who believed that vaccination against HPV obviated the need for a Papanicolaou test were two times less likely to adhere to cervical screening (adjusted odds ratio, 1.89; 95% confidence interval, 1.37-2.57; p  =  .0004). The effect was stronger in the nonmedical subgroup (adjusted odds ratio, 3.05; 95% confidence interval, 1.85-5.160; p  =  .0003).CONCLUSION: Findings highlight that misconceptions can adversely affect preventive behaviors and reduce the probability of an early diagnosis of cervical cancer.

DOI10.4278/ajhp.09113-ARB-364
Alternate JournalAm J Health Promot
PubMed ID21879936

Contact

Secretariat of the School of Medicine
 

Connect

School of Medicine's presence in social networks
Follow Us or Connect with us.