The english version of the website is under development. Wherever text appears in Greek, it means it has not been translated yet.

Δημοσίευση

The effects of vitamin E-coated membrane dialyzer compared to simvastatin in patients on chronic hemodialysis.

TitleThe effects of vitamin E-coated membrane dialyzer compared to simvastatin in patients on chronic hemodialysis.
Publication TypeJournal Article
Year of Publication2012
AuthorsKirmizis, D., Papagianni A., Dogrammatzi F., Belechri A-M., Alexopoulos E., Efstratiadis G., & Memmos D.
JournalRen Fail
Volume34
Issue9
Pagination1135-9
Date Published2012
ISSN1525-6049
KeywordsAcrylamides, Aged, Antioxidants, beta-Alanine, Biological Markers, C-Reactive Protein, Coated Materials, Biocompatible, Cross-Over Studies, Equipment Design, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Glomerular Filtration Rate, Humans, Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors, Inflammation, Interleukin-6, Kidney Failure, Chronic, Male, Membranes, Artificial, Middle Aged, Oxidative Stress, Renal Dialysis, Simvastatin, Treatment Outcome, Vitamin E
Abstract

BACKGROUND: We investigated the effects of the use of vitamin E-coated membrane (VEM) dialyzer in comparison to simvastatin on markers of chronic inflammation, oxidative stress, and endothelial cell apoptosis in ten patients on chronic hemodialysis (HD), aiming at distinguishing the different treatment effects and their time sequence on these pathogenetic routes.METHODS: Ten HD patients were sequentially submitted to a 6-month treatment with the use of VEM and 10 mg of simvastatin daily, interrupted by a 3-month washout period. At baseline, at 3, and 6 months of each trial, serum C-reactive protein (CRP), apolipoprotein (Apo) A1 and B, lipoprotein-a [Lp(a)], high-sensitivity interleukin-6 (hsIL-6), monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1), soluble intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (sICAM-1), soluble vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 (sVCAM-1), soluble E-selectin (sE-selectin), soluble Fas (sFas), soluble Fas ligand (sFasL), and plasma oxidized low-density lipoproteins (oxLDL) levels were determined.RESULTS: VEM treatment resulted in a significant decrease in CRP, IL-6, sICAM-1 at 3 months, and oxLDL at 6 months, compared to baseline. Simvastatin resulted in a significant decrease in CRP, which correlated with decreases in both total (r = 0.87, p < 0.05) and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, IL-6, sICAM-1, sVCAM-1, oxLDL, and sFas at 6 months, compared to baseline. Simvastatin effects on sVCAM-1 (mean difference = 652 ng/mL; 95% CI = 294 to 2686; p < 0.05) and sFas (mean difference = 1284 pg/mL; 95% CI = 510 to 1910; p < 0.05) differed significantly from the corresponding VEM effects.CONCLUSIONS: The 6-month use of VEM resulted in more direct and immediate anti-inflammatory effects compared with those caused by the 6-month treatment with simvastatin. Simvastatin caused a more intense decrease in the markers of inflammation, which was in part correlated with its lipid-lowering effects.

DOI10.3109/0886022X.2012.717484
Alternate JournalRen Fail
PubMed ID22950641

Contact

Secretariat of the School of Medicine
 

Connect

School of Medicine's presence in social networks
Follow Us or Connect with us.