The english version of the website is under development. Wherever text appears in Greek, it means it has not been translated yet.

Δημοσίευση

Floating elbow injuries in adults: prognostic factors affecting clinical outcomes.

TitleFloating elbow injuries in adults: prognostic factors affecting clinical outcomes.
Publication TypeJournal Article
Year of Publication2013
AuthorsDitsios, K., Boutsiadis A., Papadopoulos P., Karataglis D., Givissis P., Hatzokos I., & Christodoulou A.
JournalJ Shoulder Elbow Surg
Volume22
Issue1
Pagination74-80
Date Published2013 Jan
ISSN1532-6500
KeywordsAdolescent, Adult, Elbow Joint, Female, Humans, Humeral Fractures, Intra-Articular Fractures, Male, Middle Aged, Multiple Trauma, Prognosis, Radius Fractures, Treatment Outcome, Ulna Fractures, Young Adult
Abstract

BACKGROUND: Floating elbow fractures in adults are rare and complex injuries with unpredictable outcomes. The present study was designed to assess our experience, analyze possible compilations and illustrate prognostic factors of the final outcome.METHODS: Between 2002 and 2009, 19 patients with floating elbow fractures were treated in our department (mean follow-up, 26 months). The fractures were open in 10 patients (52.6%), and concomitant nerve palsy was present in 10 patients. Although the term "floating elbow" refers only to concomitant ipsilateral humeral and forearm shaft fractures, we also included injuries with intra-articular involvement. We categorized the patients into 4 groups: group I (10 patients) included shaft fractures of humerus and forearm, group IIa (5 patients) and IIb (1 patient) included partial intra-articular injuries, and group III (3 patients) involved only intra-articular comminuted fractures of the elbow region.RESULTS: Fracture healing was observed 14 weeks postoperatively, except in 2 patients, in which elbow arthroplasty was applied, and in 1 with brachial artery injury. Nine patients with nerve neuropraxia recovered 4 months postoperatively, and tendon transfers were necessary in 1 patient. Recovery in patients with nerve palsy was worse than in those without nerve injury (Mayo Elbow Performance Score, 73 vs 88.34; Khalfayan score, 72 vs 88.3). In addition, intra-articular involvement (groups II and III) negatively influenced the final clinical outcome compared with isolated shaft fractures (group I; Mayo Elbow Performance Score, 71.1 vs 88.5; Khalfayan score, 72.67 vs 86.1).CONCLUSIONS: Although the nature of floating elbow injuries is complex, the presence of nerve injury and intra-articular involvement predispose to worse clinical outcomes.

DOI10.1016/j.jse.2012.09.005
Alternate JournalJ Shoulder Elbow Surg
PubMed ID23237691

Contact

Secretariat of the School of Medicine
 

Connect

School of Medicine's presence in social networks
Follow Us or Connect with us.