The english version of the website is under development. Wherever text appears in Greek, it means it has not been translated yet.

Δημοσίευση

Scanning laser polarimetry in eyes with exfoliation syndrome.

TitleScanning laser polarimetry in eyes with exfoliation syndrome.
Publication TypeJournal Article
Year of Publication2013
AuthorsDimopoulos, A. T., Katsanos A., Mikropoulos D. G., Giannopoulos T., Empeslidis T., Teus M. A., Holló G., & Konstas A. G. P.
JournalEur J Ophthalmol
Volume23
Issue5
Pagination743-50
Date Published2013 Sep-Oct
ISSN1724-6016
KeywordsAged, Case-Control Studies, Cross-Sectional Studies, Exfoliation Syndrome, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Nerve Fibers, Prospective Studies, Retinal Diseases, Scanning Laser Polarimetry
Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare retinal nerve fiber layer thickness (RNFLT) of normotensive eyes with exfoliation syndrome (XFS) and healthy eyes.
METHODS: Sixty-four consecutive individuals with XFS and normal office-time intraocular pressure (IOP) and 72 consecutive healthy controls were prospectively enrolled for a cross-sectional analysis in this hospital-based observational study. The GDx-VCC parameters (temporal-superior-nasal-inferior-temporal [TSNIT] average, superior average, inferior average, TSNIT standard deviation (SD), and nerve fiber indicator [NFI]) were compared between groups. Correlation between various clinical parameters and RNFLT parameters was investigated with Spearman coefficient. 
RESULTS: The NFI, although within normal limits for both groups, was significantly greater in the XFS group compared to controls: the respective median and interquartile range (IQR) values were 25.1 (22.0-29.0) vs 15.0 (12.0-20.0), p<0.001. In the XFS group, all RNFLT values were significantly lower compared to controls (p<0.001). However, they were all within the normal clinical ranges for both groups: TSNIT average median (IQR): 52.8 (49.7-55.7) vs 56.0 (53.0-59.3) µm; superior average mean (SD): 62.3 (6.7) vs 68.8 (8.2) µm; inferior average mean (SD): 58.0 (7.2) vs 64.8 (7.7) µm, respectively. TSNIT SD was significantly lower in the XFS group, median (IQR): 18.1 (15.4-20.4) vs 21.0 (18.4-23.8), p<0.001. There was no systematic relationship between RNFLT and visual acuity, cup-to-disc ratio, IOP, central corneal thickness, Humphrey mean deviation, and pattern standard deviation in either group. 
CONCLUSIONS: Compared to control eyes, polarimetry-determined RNFLT was lower in XFS eyes with normal IOP. Therefore, close monitoring of RNFLT may facilitate early identification of those XFS eyes that convert to exfoliative glaucoma.

DOI10.5301/ejo.5000247
Alternate JournalEur J Ophthalmol
PubMed ID23483498

Contact

Secretariat of the School of Medicine
 

Connect

School of Medicine's presence in social networks
Follow Us or Connect with us.